Current Human Subjects policies are currently being updated, the current policies remain in effect until the new policies are published.
Campus Policy on the Use of Human Subjects
The protection of human subjects is paramount. All research must employ procedures designed to minimize the risk of physical, psychological or social harrn to subjects. The ultimate responsibility for assuring such protection resides with the investigator. Responsibility also resides with the investigator's department chairperson and the Human Subjects Review Committee (HSRC). A research project involving the use of human subjects including one that is conducted in conjunction with a college course may require review by the department chairperson and the HSRC before it can be conducted.
The responsibility for submission of requests for review of a research project is
the responsibility of the investigator. Investigators should use the following three
categories of research activities as a guideline for determining the extent of HSRC.
Questions concerning the classification of a particular study into one of these three
categories should be directed to the chair of the HSRC.
Investigators who feel their projects fall under this category must contact the chair of the HSRC for determination of exemption. Descriptions of the sorts of projects that fit this designation follow:
Projects involving collection of data through the use of opinion surveys, questionnaires or interviews (e.g. SOFIS, marketing surveys, exit interviews) for which response is voluntary and completely anonymous. When data gathered concern issues of personal sensitivity (e.g., drug use, criminal behavior, sexual behavior), investigators should file a memorandum with the HSRC which briefly describes the nature of the project and explains how anonymity will be guaranteed at least one week before commencing with the project.
Projects limited to activities involving normal educational practices in commonly accepted educational settings (e.g., in-class demonstration studies, laboratory exercises, studies of curriculum or teaching strategies). Usually any study which requires that subjects be removed from their normal classroom situation for testing is not exempt.
Projects limited to the observation of public behavior for which anonymity of subjects is maintained.
Projects limited to the examination and analysis of existing data or specimens so long as
these are publicly available and individual subjects will not be identified in any
report of the research.
The project does not meet the criteria for Category I and involves no more than minimal risk to the subject. Minimal risk is defined as "the risks of harm, anticipated in the proposed research are not greater, considering probability and magnitude, than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests" (HHS regulations). Projects that require expedited review include the following:
[ Back to Top ]
Projects that do not meet the criteria for Category II because subjects will be exposed to more than minimal risk (e.g., use of invasive techniques or unusual therapeutic techniques such as hypnosis).
Projects requiring the use of deception.
Projects requiring the use of subjects from populations in need of special protection (e.g.,
prisoners, individuals with disabilities, pregnant women, and children).
Many exempt projects can be conducted without full HSRC review, but require the filing of a memorandum with the HSRC one week before data collection begins. In these cases, the chair of the HSRC and a designated member of the Committee will evaluate the effectiveness of procedures designed to maintain the anonymity of subjects. If these procedures are not deemed adequate, then specific changes for improving the protection of anonymity will be requested or the investigator will be asked to submit a protocol for HSRC review.
If your project requires expedited or full review, then you must submit a protocol
to the HSRC. Ordinarily, it takes at least three weeks to complete an expedited review.
The expedited review is done by mail ballot. Each member of the HSRC receives a copy
of your protocol for review. Members are allowed 3 weeks to register any concerns
or objections they might have to the manner in which human subjects will be used.
Concerns or objections can often be dealt with by having the investigator respond
to the specific concerns. If the concerns/objections warrant, a full HSRC review may
be conducted. Full HSRC review includes a formal hearing during which the HSRC members
may ask questions directly of the investigators about the need for the planned use
of human subjects. During the hearing, investigators may amend their proposal in response
to concerns of HSRC members. After the hearing, members of the HSRC vote to either
approve or disapprove the proposed project.
In order for the HSRC to have adequate information on which to base their review of a proposed project, the investigator or instructor submitting a proposal must attach a written description of the project. This description must at a minimum specify the following:
[ Back to Top ]
All communications with the HSRC should be submitted to the Research Services Office.
Approved protocols are good for a period of one year. If a project continues beyond one year and the investigator/instructor has not made any significant changes in the procedures outlined in the original protocol, a memorandum requesting reapproval is all that must be submitted. Any significant change requires a new review by the HSRC.
Informed consent forms must be retained by the investigator/instructor for a period of not less than three years following the termination of the project.
At any point during the project, problems arising from the use of human subjects must be reported to the HSRC.
Within thirty (30) days of the conclusion of data collection on an approved project,
a memorandum must be filed with the HSRC indicating project termination and specifying
any difficulties that occurred with the use of human subjects.
All student investigators must have a College supervisor who is responsible for insuring that all procedures of the approval are complied with by the investigator. The faculty supervisor must sign the proposal certifying that the project is under his/her supervision.
Class projects may be reviewed as one proposal, at the discretion of the instructor. If the entire class is not using the same procedure, each student or group of students using a different procedure must submit the required information, but the class project will still be considered one proposal.
In general, it is advisable for students to select research projects which are exempt (Category I) or eligible for "expedited review" (Category II). In this way, approval for the projects will take very little time. Students are not, however, prohibited from conducting research in Category III, but additional time may be required to obtain approval from the full HSRC. In all cases, it is the responsibility of the instructor to ensure that students use only approved procedures.
To further expedite the approval of class projects, the instructor can obtain approval before the semester begins under two circumstances: 1) if all of the students are using the same procedure (e.g., a class survey) and the instructor has established the procedures before the class starts, or 2) the instructor submits a list of alternative procedures for approval and the students are to choose one from the list.
Projects conducted as instructional demonstrations where subjects are not solicited
from outside the classroom generally do not need to be reviewed. Care should be taken,
however, to protect the rights and welfare of students who act as subjects.
"Informed consent" means the knowing consent of an individual, or his/her legally authorized representative, who is able to exercise free power of choice without undue inducement or any form of force, fraud, deceit, duress or other form of constraint or coercion. An investigator shall seek consent under the following circumstances:
[ Back to Top ]