This website works best with a current browser. Update your browser from

Education Professionals - Assessment System

College of Education
Office of the Dean
705 Maytum Hall
State University of New York at Fredonia
Fredonia, NY 14063
(716) 673-3311 phone
(716) 673-3794 fax


Curriculum & Instruction
E268 Thompson Hall
State University of New York at Fredonia
Fredonia, NY 14063
(716) 673-3701 phone
(716) 673-4664 fax

Language, Learning & Leadership
E262 Thompson Hall
State University of New York at Fredonia
Fredonia, NY 14063
(716) 673-3702 phone
(716) 673-4664 fax

The College of Education-Professional Education Unit (COE-PEU) is NCATE accredited. NCATE is the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. In Fall 2015, the COE-PEU will be reviewed for re-accreditation by the Council for the Assessment of Educator Preparation (CAEP), the body into which NCATE has evolved.

As part of this accreditation, the COE-PEU developed a Quality Assurance system. This  system is a comprehensive, effective system that collects and analyzes data on teacher and other school professional candidates’ performance and professional education unit operations to evaluate and improve the COE-PEU and individual education programs.

See a graphical representation of the system.

For candidates in the programs, it is about describing what we want them to learn, and how we know whether they learned it. These include measures of performance that are part of individual programs (what is required of candidates within programs) and well as measures of performance that are part of the unit (what is required of candidates within the whole professional education unit). Measures of performance that are part of individual programs are aligned with that programs Specialty Professional Association (or SPA) standards, or with National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). Measures of performance that are part of the unit are aligned with CAEP standards. In some cases, both the individual program and the unit may use the same measure of performance.

The individual program SPA expects measures of candidates'

  • Knowledge of Content as measured by performance on state examinations. For our candidates this is their performance on the New York State Teacher Certification Exams (NYSTCE). See official NYS performance data.
  • Knowledge of Content as measured by some other instrument (some programs use grade point average in select courses, others use program specific content assignments .
  • Ability to plan for instruction (as measured by the teacher work samples that candidates provide during field experiences. See the description.).
  • Ability to student teach (as measured by a performance evaluation of student teaching)
  • Ability to affect student learning (as measured, in part, by the teacher work samples that candidates provide during field experiences. See the description.).
  • Some other assessments of candidates’ abilities to meet specific program SPA standards

CAEP expects the unit to measure candidates' content and pedagogical knowledge and skills, and professional responsibility through evidence of candidate demonstration of understanding of the InTASC Standards. Moreover, CAEP looks for evidence of the impact that program completers have on P-12 student learning

Professional Dispositions, as well as Academic Concerns, are monitored by the Academic and Dispositions Concerns Review Board (ADCRB). See a description of this body.

In addition, CAEP expects candidates to develop knowledge and skills related to supporting diverse learners and using and promoting technology in their profession.

The SUNY Fredonia COE-PEU conceptual framework contains measurable expectations that are also aligned with the NCATE expectations of candidate performance. These include

  1. Candidates demonstrate a thorough understanding of Instructional Practices embodied by the core processes comprising responsive education - Planning, Instructing, Reflecting and Responding – and the ability to effectively use assessment to inform practice and engage learners in their own growth adapting instruction in response to various indicators of student performance.
  2. Candidates possess a thorough understanding of content, context, and human development (i.e., Discipline - Specific Content Knowledge, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, General Knowledge, Pedagogical Knowledge, Common Core State Standards, and Human Learning and Development) and apply these knowledge bases to improve student learning.
  3. Candidates possess both a theoretical and empirical grounding in pedagogy and are well versed in a variety of instructional strategies to make learning accessible for all learners (procedural knowledge). Candidates also know when, where and why to apply these specific strategies (conditional knowledge).
  4. Candidates demonstrate an understanding of how learners grow and develop (cognitively, linguistically, socially, emotionally, and physically) and apply this understanding in conjunction with explicit strategies to minimize bias and advance equity and intercultural understanding in designing developmentally appropriate and challenging inclusive learning experiences promoting high standards for each learner.
  5. Candidates demonstrate Professional Responsibility by modeling positive professional characteristics that foster growth and learning in the classroom. They are ethical practitioners who are life-long learners, child advocates, collaborators and well - behaved professionals at all times.
  6. Candidates internalize the P-I-R‐R process and use research and evidence, as well as technology tools to develop an understanding of teaching and infuse these into their daily instructional practice to measure P‐12 student progress and adapt their instruction in response to student performance to improve learning.

As candidates progress through their programs, their progress is monitored through various transition points (critical points in the program for which quality of performance is checked for continuation in the program).

Page modified 12/7/15