FCC RULING
Limits eased for media owners
By FRANK AHRENS
Washington Post
6/3/2003

 

WASHINGTON - A sharply divided Federal Communications Commission on Monday relaxed or eliminated several key media ownership restrictions, holding that the decades-old rules were out of date with a rapidly changing media landscape populated by hundreds of cable, satellite and Internet choices.

The changes would permit a new wave of consolidation among newspaper, television and radio companies, which proponents say will increase competition and produce more and better news. Opponents fear the new rules place too much power over public opinion in the hands of a few giant media corporations.

By a 3-to-2 vote along party lines, the five-member commission largely lifted the 28-year-old ban that prohibited a newspaper from buying a television or radio station in the same city. Additionally, the commission allowed broadcast networks to buy more stations at the local and national levels.

At the same time, the commission upheld a rule prohibiting a major network (ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox) from buying another network, and it tightened regulations on local radio ownership, seeking to stanch the widespread consolidation that followed Congress' decision to lift national radio ownership limits in 1996.

Both sides claimed they were voting in the public interest and for free speech. The commission's three Republicans, led by Chairman Michael K. Powell, said the new rules were needed because federal courts have tossed out prior ownership restrictions, leaving no checks to consolidation in place.

But the two Democrats, led by Michael J. Copps, said the Republican solution will harm free speech as more and more local media operations are absorbed by large corporations, creating homogenized news and entertainment and pushing unpopular and minority viewpoints off the airwaves. The Republicans backed away from drafting rules they feared would judge content. Monday's vote was the culmination of months of intense corporate and public lobbying, as each side fought to either sweep away or tighten the ownership rules. Media companies such as News Corp. and Walt Disney Co. said their businesses were hamstrung by obsolete rules that prevented their broadcast networks and stations from competing effectively with the burgeoning cable broadcast industry.

In order to keep providing free, over-the-air programming, broadcasters claimed to need the additional revenue brought in by owning more television stations. On the other side, the FCC received more than 500,000 postcards and e-mails spurred by advocacy groups as disparate as Common Cause and the National Rifle Association protesting the changes, saying any further concentration of media ownership will keep their voices off the air.

return to Courses Page
return to Home Page