M
A I N * S
C H E D U L E * N
E W S * L
I N K S * R
E S E R V E S
More!
About This Page
This is the page to consult before you do the readings for a given class
period, while you're thinking about what you've read, when you're generating
ideas for your film analyses or essays, or whenever you want to find out
more about the field of African American Studies. In it, I'm including
ideas about how the assigned readings fit together or conflict with each
other, gestures toward providing historical and social context, suggestions
for further reading on various topics, and useful links that relate to
each week's materials. Feel free to suggest
things to add to this page--and thanks in advance for your suggestions.
Week 1: Overview
This week, we'll mostly be getting to know each other--but I also want
us to consider the big questions that we often forget to ask at the beginning
of a course, not only about requirements and content, but also about purposes,
goals, and structure: why a course in "African American" literature and
culture? what for? why am I teaching/taking it? what are my own expectations,
hopes, worries, interests? how do my answers to these questions relate
to everyone else's?
Some macro questions that we will keep returning to over the course
of the semester include: what makes a literary tradition? what makes a
culture? how are we to define an African American literary tradition? African
American culture? what are the relations in a given era among African American
literary culture, African American popular culture, the larger U.S. literary
culture, the larger U.S. popular culture, and literary and popular cultures
in the new world and across the diaspora?
These kinds of questions should always be in the background while we
examine various African American literary responses to the four places
that structure the course--country, city, nation, world--and we will at
times bring them into the foreground. But our primary interest will be
in examining as attentively and precisely as possible how and to what ends
various writers and filmmakers are responding to social conditions, historical
legacies, images of, and narratives about a given place, and how their
responses and representations change over time.
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
For an entertaining, humorous, but ultimately serious introduction to current
directions and issues in the field of Black Studies, read Robin D.G. Kelley's
essay, "Looking B(l)ackward: African-American Studies in the Age of Identity
Politics," the introduction to the collection of essays, Race Consciousness:
African-American Studies for the New Century, edited by Judith Jackson
Fossett and Jeffrey Tucker, on reserve at the circulation desk of Reed
Library.
-
Two other essays that raise important issues related to this course can
be found in The House That Race Built, edited by Wahneema Lubiano,
also on reserve: David Lionel Smith's "What Is Black Culture?" and Stuart
Hall's "Subjects in History: Making Diasporic Identities."
-
You can also get an overview of the field of Black Studies by searching
the web. A good starting-off point is the links page on this web site;
see in particular the literary
and cultural studies sites and the list of Black
Studies Programs on that page.
Week 2: Vernacular
This week should be a good introduction to the main features of the
course--among them, a focus on readings by multiple authors around a particular
topic each week. The plan for this week is that on Tuesday we'll consider
some of the larger theoretical issues around what the Norton editors
call "the vernacular tradition"--largely by focusing on the essays by Gates
and McKay, O'Meally, Johnson, and Hurston. Then, on Thursday, we'll continue
in this direction by listening to a lecture by pedagogy theorist Pat Courts
on current sociolinguistic research into the black vernacular and some
of its political implications, and afterwards open up a discussion that
relates these theoretical perspectives with attempts by artists from both
the nineteenth (Dunbar, Chesnutt) and twentieth centuries (Brown, Hughes,
Dash) to represent the black vernacular in text and on film. (Speaking
of the film, I highly recommend checking out the web sites devoted to Daughters
of the Dust before viewing the film on Wednesday night; for links,
click here.)
I include the "folk tales" because so many of the writers we'll be reading
this semester are re-working them; even though we're not going to devote
much class discussion, I will be expecting you to draw links between them
and other works in the course (perhaps even in a critical response essay
or final essay for the course).
We'll be using this kind of theory/practice organization in several
other units (for instance, on the Harlem Renaissance and the Black Arts
Movement), so it's important to emphasize that although we'll be emphasizing
conceptual issues on Tuesdays and aesthetic issues on Thursdays, there
is no firm and unpassable divide between theory and practice or between
concepts and aesthetics or even, for that matter, between non-fiction and
fiction. As you're reading these works, try to be aware of the form, structure,
and style of the essays and of the theoretical issues that the works of
fiction are raising.
The other major way this unit is a good introduction to the main features
of the course is that your first set of discussion questions and your first
film analysis are due this week. Here are some tips on writing good discussion
questions:
-
First, be aware that we're sometimes going to be reading more for a particular
class period than we have time to discuss in class. Think of your discussion
questions as an opportunity to steer in-class conversation toward the readings/passages
you found to be most interesting, or to sum up or otherwise draw together
the issues arising from the readings that you found to be most important.
I can't guarantee that in class we'll cover every question posted to the
listserv, but you increase the odds of your interests and concerns being
addressed in class by putting them in the form of interesting questions--and
you also increase the odds that someone will respond to them on the listserv,
whether or not they get addressed in class.
-
Second, you should be aware of the kinds of questions you can be asking.
Questions about terminology and definitions, historical context, contemporary
connections, and future possibilities are always important to ask, and
often can be quite productive to begin a class discussion. You should not,
however, ask only these kinds of questions on the listserv. If some of
your questions are of this nature, I would suggest asking more than the
minimum (3) for that week. It's very difficult to get a + on a question
that is basically calling for a factual or speculative answer--for a course
of this kind, what should be happening in class are exchanges of relatively
informed and reasoned opinions, interpretations, and hypotheses. Questions
that don't look like they'll lead to these kinds of exchanges can be useful
to me by showing what kind of things about which you need more information
or are curious. But the kinds of questions most valued in this course will
most likely:
-
(1) relate to a specific passage or claim or assumption or image pattern
or use of language in one of the assigned readings for that week (if so,
be sure to quote and cite it in such a way that the rest of us can find
it!);
-
(2) involve comparisons or contrasts between two or more of the assigned
readings for that week (sometimes the best strategy on this is to find
places where two essayists appear to be contradicting or disagreeing with
each other, or where a storyteller seems to be doing something different
from what an essayist suggested should be happening, or when two writers
are presenting radically different representations of the same place);
-
(3) draw on your knowledge of British or American literature related to
the assigned readings for that week in order to bring out similarities
and differences;
-
(4) draw on your knowledge of the history related to the assigned readings
for that week in order to focus closely on the author's particular perspective
or style of representing a given event or process;
-
(5) begin with your own interpretation of a particular passage or reading
and ask people what they think.
-
I'll be happy to add to this list when I see other kinds of questions being
asked that stand out. Feel free to announce what kind of question you're
asking, particularly if it's a kind you haven't read about here, when you
post your discussion questions.
-
Third, you should be aware that your audience is not likely to understand
your question or appreciate its importance unless you have some explanation
of why you're asking the question, why it matters to you, or why you think
it's interesting or important. The better you state your case for your
question's relevance, interest, or importance in the discussion question
e-mail itself, the more likely it will be addressed in class.
-
Fourth, do your best to resist two temptations: on the one hand, resist
the urge to ignore what others who have posted their questions earlier
than you have asked, and, on the other hand, resist the urge to simply
repeat in your own words what others who have posted their questions earlier
than you have asked. You have to strike a balance between independence
and collaboration. Think of the listserv as taking part in a weirdly asynchronous
conversation (which is also a good way to think of our participation in
African American Studies); if someone asks a good question that you also
want us to discuss in class, acknowledge that person or question and then
also try to add some new topics of your own to the mix.
-
Fifth, think of this process of asking questions and reading others' questions
as a warm-up exercise for coming up with questions that you want to research
(either through close reading of primary texts or through that close reading
supplemented by secondary readings). For more on this topic, see my rationale
for assigning similar discussion questions in my other course this semester
by clicking here.
-
Sixth, always be striving for improvement over the course of the semester
and from week to week. If your early questions are largely about
things you find confusing that you need clarified, or if they are not directly
about the readings for that week, or don't show an awareness of the options
open to you or fail to practice some of the things suggested here, don't
be content to continue in that rut! I'm looking for improvement over
the course of the semester, and the best way to improve is to experiment
with different kinds of questions you can be asking.
-
Finally, if you find it difficult to generate questions, you should take
that as a sign that you either are not reading the texts carefully enough
or not giving yourself enough time to think about them. The more
attentive your reading is and the more developed your thinking about individual
texts or the relation between various texts is, the better your odds of
coming up with better questions.
As for your film analyses, there are many directions to choose from,
or to mix together, including:
-
discussing how you see the film drawing on, responding to, or transforming
common assumptions or stereotypes about a given place (in this first unit
of the course, that would be country/rural);
-
discussing how the film relates to the readings for that week or in that
unit, or how it compares to other films in that unit or from other units;
-
looking ahead to other topics/places that the film addresses/represents
(for instance, you could see Daughters of the Dust as a migration
[week 5] or neo-slave [week 4] narrative)--or looking back to topics/places
we've already discussed that the film also relates to (for instance, week
5's film, Do the Right Thing, certainly has a lot to do with images
of the city, although not much with migration, but it also relates to the
vernacular [week 2]).
But above all, you have to remember that this is a "film analysis," not
a movie review. Your goal should be to relate what you see and hear happening
in that film to what you've been reading and thinking about. Comments on
the acting, cinematography, plot, dialogue, and so on are only useful insofar
as they contribute to your argument about how the film relates to the central
issues of the course. In the same vein, comments that you liked or
didn't like the film, plot summaries, one-paragraph observations, or other
features that would show a lack of thought and consideration put into your
film analysis are to be avoided.
Now, you'll have noted that I haven't talked about length yet. I would
suggest writing it out in a word-processing program first, so that you
can more easily draft, revise, put it aside and come back to it, and aim
for a single-spaced page or so which, when it's in a shape you like, you
can then copy and paste into an email message addressed to the listserv.
A bit shorter and a bit longer is ok, but it should be a fairly sustained
informal essay, so don't let it get too short. But by the same token be
as concise as possible out of courtesy to your classmates. The key thing
is to generate an interesting perspective on the film and explore questions
or connections in more detail than you'd be able to in class with less
at stake than doing the same thing in a critical response or final essay.
In short, think of each film analysis as an informal interpretive essay,
in which you're trying to make a point about the film in question, to get
people to understand why you interpret the film the way you do.
Above all, you should use the film analysis as a space to reflect on
what you've been seeing, reading, and thinking about in this course.
Treating the film analysis (or, for that matter, the discussion questions)
as some sort of clock-punching rote exercise will get you nowhere--on the
one hand, it will hurt your class participation/preparation grade (which
is a significant portion of your final grade), and on the other hand, it
will give you little practice in the critical thinking and argument-developing
skills that are so central to good performance on your two essays in the
course.
I'll read your analyses and write some sort of response over the weekend,
so be checking your email and reading each other's emails when you get
a chance over the weekend, and feel free to refer to people's ideas in
class on Tuesday as we begin our discussion of Frederick Douglass's famous
slave narrative.
Some specific Daughters...-related suggestions might help you
not only generate your first film analysis, but also help flesh out some
of the preceding tips. The film is set in 1902, not far off from the time
that Dunbar and Chesnutt were writing, so you might look for connections
there. The myth of the flying Africans that we saw in "All God's Chillen
Had Wings" is told and retold several times in the film; you might write
on the differences between the versions and what they reveal about the
speaker's attitudes and motivations. Today's lecture and discussion about
the politics of dialect and discourse have all sorts of applications to
what seem to be central issues in the film, including the characters' various
attitudes toward Yellow Mary or Nana, toward the past and future, and toward
Sea Island or gullah culture/vernacular. You might consider Johnson's suggestions
about future directions artists interested in the vernacular should take
and see which Dash listened to, which she disagreed with, and what other
things she was trying to accomplish. You might take a few of Hurston's
key claims about "the characteristics of Negro expression" and consider
Dash's possible perspective on them based on what you see happening in
the film (if you look at the Geechee Girls website on the links page, for
instance, there's a tribute to Hurston on it). Don't feel that you have
to choose one of these options--in fact, I'm much more interested in what
you come up with on your own--but if you find any of these suggestions
useful as a starting-off point, make whatever use of it you see fit.
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
As always, the editorial apparatus of the Norton is priceless--not
just the introductory essays and timeline, but also the bibliographical
essays at the back of the book--particularly when you have a topic that
excites your interest and you want to find out more about it. Always start
there!
-
If you're interested in finding out more about the vernacular tradition,
for instance, the best place to start is with the Norton's bibliography.
For a concise example of how to relate a work of literature to the vernacular,
see Wahneema Lubiano's "The Postmodernist Rag: Political Identity and the
Vernacular in Song of Solomon," in New Essays on Song of
Solomon, ed. Valerie Smith (on reserve). For a concise example of
a cultural studies approach to the black vernacular, see Evelyn Brooks
Higginbotham's "Rethinking Vernacular Culture: Black Religion and
Race Records in the 1920s and 1930s" (in The House That Race Built,
ed. Wahneema Lubiano). For a more extended treatment of the vernacular's
relation to literature and literary theory, see Henry Louis Gates's The
Signifying Monkey: A Theory of Afro-American Literary Criticism and
Houston Baker's Blues, Ideology, and Afro-American Literature (both
on reserve). Also on reserve are David Howard-Pitney's Afro-American
Jeremiad: Appeals for Justice in America, Dolan Hubbard's The Sermon
and the African American Literary Imagination, and Gayl Jones's Liberating
Voices: Oral Tradition in African American Literature, all of which
focus on oral traditions, and several works that focus on musical traditions,
among them Tricia Rose's
Black Noise, Mark Anthony Neal's What
the Music Said: Black PopularMusic and Black Public Culture, and Angela
Y. Davis's Blues Legacies and Black Feminism.
-
If you're interested in the myth of the flying African, you have to read
the most sustained exploration of it in African American literature, Toni
Morrison's novel Song of Solomon.
-
If you're interested in literary connections to Dash's film, Gloria Naylor's
novel Mama Day is set on a different Sea Island, but is one of the
most amazing novels I've read in the '90s, so I recommend it highly. I
noticed on the credits that Dash borrowed something from Paule Marshall's
novel Praisesong for the Widow in producing the movie. While watching
the movie this time, I also saw many connections between it and Gayl Jones's
novel Corregidora. All these novels came before Dash's film and
are well worth reading as precursors to it and as providing themes, imagery,
topics, and so on that she could rework and transform. If you want to find
out what happens to these characters, the "sequel" to Daughters of the
Dust is Dash's novel of the same name that was published earlier this
year.
-
California Newsreel is offering a new movie on gullah history called The
Language You Cry In (Alvaro Toepke and Angel Serrano, 1999, 56 min.)--billed
as a scholarly detective story, it explores musical connections between
the Sea Islands and West Africa. Click here
for further information.
-
If you want to find out more about the "migration narrative," see Farah
Griffin's book on literary and non-literary representations of the Great
Migration, Who Set You Flowin'? The African-American Migration Narrative
(on reserve). For looks at the genre of the "neo-slave narrative"--largely
contemporary novels that revisit the slave narrative and the legacies of
slavery as they play out in the present, but more generally any post-enslavement
engagement with slavery--see the collection Slavery and the Literary
Imagination, edited by Deborah McDowell and Arnold Rampersad (on reserve),
my own essay in Race Consciousness, edited by Judith Jackson Fossett
and Jeffrey Tucker (on reserve), and Ashraf H.A. Rushdy's Neo-Slave
Narratives (not yet on reserve, but on order). Finally, Toni Morrison
has an important essay called "The Site of Memory" in which she discusses
her own literary project's relation to the slave narrative (it's in a collection
called Out There, which I'm not putting on reserve, but which isn't
hard to find); there is also a wonderful collection called Conversations
with Toni Morrison, which includes many interviews in which she discusses
her writing of Beloved as a meditation on slavery.
Week 3: Slavery I
As the Norton preface and introduction to the "Literature of
Slavery and Freedom" section argues, the slave narrative is not only one
of the originary African American literary genres, but also one of the
first genres to be recognized as an original "American" literary form.
Along with the poetry of Phyllis Wheatley and the oral/musical/non-literary/vernacular
tradition we touched on last week, the slave narratives can be considered
as foundational to all of African American literature. Hence we continue
the "country" unit over the next two weeks by moving from the vernacular
tradition to the genre of slave narrative (Douglass, Jacobs) and neo-slave
narrative (Chesnutt, Johnson, and the three films in this "country" unit),
along with a brief taste of poetry produced during or about slavery times
(Wheatley, Frances E.W. Harper, Dunbar, Hayden).
This week we'll be focusing on the text by and figure of Frederick Douglass
(we will turn to his "What to the Slave Is Fourth of July" during week
9, in the "nation" unit). His first slave narrative, Narrative of the
Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, Written by Himself is
often the only work of African-American literature students encounter in
an introductory survey of American literature. Douglass was one of the
first African American authors to be included in the canon of American
literature (perhaps only Toni Morrison is more firmly canonized in contemporary
literary studies). Our goal this week will be to understand Douglass and
his slave narrative in relation to the state of the Union around 1845 (the
year it was first published)--in its historical context--as well as in
relation to African American literary and cultural traditions.
For Tuesday's class, we'll begin by discussing Julie Dash's Daughters
of the Dust as a neo-slave narrative and contrasting its representation
of slavery with Douglass's. And then we'll turn to major passages in the
Narrative.
Thursday's class will be organized largely by your questions, but in general,
we will try to relate the movie version of Toni Morrison's novel Beloved
to issues coming out of Douglass's Narrative. So be looking for
connections and contrasts as you watch Beloved this Wednesday, and
if you've seen it already, consider drafting discussion questions by Tuesday
evening that enable us to effectively juxtapose these two very different
works.
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
The Norton includes excerpts from Douglass's two later autobiographies,
My
Bondage and My Freedom and The Life and Times of Frederick Douglass,
and it is well worth comparing his earlier and later texts. Many scholars
are coming to see the former as the most significant text of Douglass's
career; it would be a great final project to read it in its entirety and
produce a comparison/contrast of the 1845 and 1854 versions of his text.
The Norton also includes excerpts from other slave narratives, in
addition to the Harriet Jacobs text we'll be reading for next week, and
it would be fruitful to compare Douglass's and other slave narrators' representations
of slavery in a critical response or final essay. Also in the Norton
is a selection of other African American literature produced during the
antebellum period, some of which we'll be reading next week (a few of Wheatley's
poems). A comparison/contrast paper on the slave narrative's relation to
other genres of African American or American literature would also be a
productive topic.
-
I've ordered the Norton Critical Edition of Douglass's narrative, which
contains historical documents that provide useful contexts for understanding
his project, his audience, and other significant matters. For more by and
on Douglass, see The Oxford Frederick Douglass Reader and Frederick
Douglass: New Literary and Historical Essays. For complete texts of
other slave narratives, see The Classic Slave Narratives and Pioneers
of the Black Atlantic: Five Slave Narratives, 1772-1815. These works
may prove useful if you want background while reading or come up with a
question that none of us can answer, but they're most likely to be useful
when you're working on your critical response or final essay, so be sure
to familiarize yourself with what's available for your use on reserve and
in the library more generally.
-
We talked a bit about pro-slavery arguments and arguments like the emerging
labor movement's critiques of "wage slavery" that implicitly or explicitly
supported slavery. For more on this latter topic, see David Roediger's
The
Wages of Whiteness. We also discussed the significance of Douglass
focusing on Irish immigrants in key passages in his narrative; for historical
context on this, see Theodore Allen's The Invention of the White Race,
Volume I: Racial Oppression and Social Control and Noel Ignatiev's
How
the Irish became White (his essay "Immigrants and Whites" is less scholarly
but just as provocative; see me for a copy). For more on ideas of
race and of whiteness, see the links on my home
page.
-
The links
page has a slowly growing list of links. When more references are available,
I'll put up a more specific link to that page here. You might check out
the web sites on Toni Morrison for a sense of what's going on the film
and how the film differs from the novel.
-
A quick list of neo-slave narratives in novel form that you might be interested
in pursuing further: David Bradley's The Chaneysville Incident,
Octavia Butler's Kindred, Maryse Conde's I, Tituba, Black Witch
of Salem, Charles Johnson's Oxherding Tale and Middle Passage,
Gayl Jones's Corregidora, Toni Morrison's Beloved, Ishmael
Reed's Flight to Canada, Margaret Walker's Jubilee, and Shirley
Anne Williams's Dessa Rose. See Ashraf Rushdy's Neo-Slave
Narratives for a critical overview and interpretation of this genre.
Week 4: Slavery II
This week we're exploring gender and genre differences in the experiences
and representations of slavery. We're comparing Douglass's and Jacobs's
treatments of gender and sexuality, we're comparing antebellum slave narratives
with antebellum poetry (Harper, Wheatley), and we're comparing (if we have
time) neo-slave narratives in the form of short stories (Chesnutt, Johnson)
and poetry (Dunbar, Hayden). The reading load is a bit lighter, but the
analytical load is heavy, given that we're also tracking how neo-slave
narratives in film (Beloved and Down in the Delta) relate
to the representations of rural life and of plantation slavery in the texts.
We'll be using Down in the Delta more in next Tuesday's discussion
to help us make the transition from country to city than on Thursday, but
as you watch the movie, be thinking about how the country is represented
as opposed to the representations of the city as well as about how family
and history is dealt with in the movie.
We covered a lot of ground this week, but we left much to be uncovered,
as well. Harper's poems "The Slave Mother" and "Vashti" deal with
similar issues of separation of families and sexual abuse of black women
under slavery, and it would be interesting to write a paper comparing and
contrasting Jacobs and Harper's treatments of these issues. The issue
of Christianity and its support of slavery and racism in the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries also links all the texts we've read the past two
weeks; you might compare and contrast Douglass, Wheatley, and Harper on
this issue. The issue of Christianity and its influence on early
African American writers' views of Africa might be profitably explored
in Wheatley's poems and Harper's "Ethiopia"--it continues into the twentieth
century in such poems as Arna Bontemps's "Golgotha Is a Mountain" (NA
1240-1242) and Countee Cullen's "Heritage" (NA 1311-1314).
And of course, the monumental popularity of Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle
Tom's Cabin is something that mid-nineteenth-century African American writers
had to respond to; see, for example, Harper's "Eliza Harris," which might
profitably be compared and contrasted with Frederick Douglass's rhetorical
strategies in his novella The Heroic Slave (surprisingly not included
in the Norton, but which I can get for you) in a critical response
essay. One other connection worth pursuing is to trace the shift
in images of a post-slavery, post-racism "paradise" or "promised land"
in Wheatley's "On the Death Of Rev. Mr. George Whitefield," Harper's "Ethiopia,"
Hayden's "Frederick Douglass," and Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream"
(all in the Norton).
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
The two best sources for more information on Jacobs are the full text of
her Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, edited by Jean Fagan
Yellin, and Harriet Jacobs and Incidents in the Life of a Slave
Girl: New Critical Essays, eds. Rafia Zafar and Deborah Garfield
(both on reserve, or at least on order). See Deborah Gray White's Ain't
I a Woman? Female Slaves in the Plantation South for a classic treatment
of gender and slavery, and check out the Norton's bibliography section
on Jacobs for further suggestions.
-
Two major essays on Phillis Wheatley's poetry might usefully complicate
impulses to see her poetry as simply expressing a kind of self-hatred or
conformity to white expectations: June Jordan's June Jordan's "The
Difficult Miracle of Black Poetry in America or Something Like a Sonnet
for
Phillis Wheatley," in her book of political essays On Call and
Barbara Johnson's "Euphemism, Understatement, and the Passive Voice:
A Genealogy of Afro-American Poetry," in the essay collection Reading
Black, Reading Feminist, edited by Henry Louis Gates, Jr. (both of
which will soon be on reserve but which I can get to you if you want to
see them before then). Two slightly longer studies of her work can
be found in Henry Louis Gates's Figures in Black and Frances Smith
Foster's Written by Herself (both soon to be on reserve).
-
Scholarship on slavery is burgeoning, and has been for decades, so the
following suggestions are only meant as an illustrative starting point--something
akin to the angels dancing on the head of the needle in the haystack on
the tip of the iceberg, if you catch my drift. Orlando Patterson's Slavery
and Social Death, one of the most influential syntheses of the scholarship
on slavery, is a great place to start. His first chapter provides a definition
of slavery that has influenced many literary and cultural critics. The
Slave's Narrative, ed. Charles Davis and Henry Louis Gates, Jr., is
a good place to start when considering the slave narrative as a genre,
as is Robert Stepto's From Behind the Veil: A Study of Afro-American
Narrative, William Andrews's To Tell a Free Story, and Frances
Smith Foster's Witnessing Slavery: The Development of Antebellum Slave
Narratives. Two works that are well worth considering to see how this
scholarship has developed in recent years are Saidiya Hartman's Scenes
of Subjection and Jennifer Fleischner's Mastering Slavery: Memory,
Family, and Identity in Women's Slave Narratives. See the list of reserves
for other primary and secondary works on the slave narrative.
-
Down in the Delta is in many ways a response to attempts to attribute
the rise of an urban "underclass" since the '60s to a "culture of poverty"
or similar pathologies purportedly endemic to the "black community." Like
all the movies we've seen thus far, it is not only about the country and
the city, or slavery, or vernacular culture, but it is also about family.
If you are interested in debates over "the black family," a great place
to start is The Moynihan Report and the Politics of Controversy,
eds. Lee Rainwater and William Yancey. If you like a challenge, check out
Hortense Spillers's brilliant and dense article that is in part a critique
of the Moynihan Report, "Mama's Baby, Papa's Maybe: An American Grammar
Book," collected in Within the Circle, ed. Angelyn Mitchell (on
reserve). Among the similarly-huge volume of debates over the category
of "underclass," see in particular Adolph Reed's provocative "The Underclass
as Myth and Symbol," Cornel West's "Nihilism in Black America" (in his
book Race Matters), and Stephen Steinberg's "The Liberal Retreat
from Race during the Post-Civil Rights Era" (in The House That Race
Built, ed. Wahneema Lubiano [on reserve]).
-
I also wanted to alert you to three contemporary connections to the issues
of slavery and abolition we've been considering. Slavery still exists today,
and many Christian organizations are involved in "slave redemption" projects
in Africa; this generally involves buying slaves' freedom. You might check
out Jacobs's critiques of this process as it played out in the antebellum
period on pages 231 and 244. On the abolition front, one of the most interesting
political projects I've seen in recent years is a group known as the New
Abolitionists, who publish the journal Race
Traitor. In a nutshell, their goal is to "abolish the white race";
to see what they mean by this, click on the link above, which will take
you to the on-line version of their journal. The final connection
is to Angela Davis's lecture at the University of Rochester in mid-October,
in which she discussed what is at stake in working for the abolition of
the prison system that we have in the United States (see week 8, below,
for more on Davis.
Week 5: Migration
We begin the "city" unit this week
by considering issues associated with the Great Migration. I'd like
to claim that I planned to pair Maya Angelou's reverse migration narrative
Down
in the Delta with August Wilson's dramatic meditation on the migration
narrative in Ma Rainey's Black Bottom because the Chicago connection
between them was so important and worth considering, but actually I had
forgotten what specific city each was set in! (It's too bad that
I decided that Richard Wright's
Black Boy and Native Son
were too long to include in an introductory course, because both also represent
Chicago.) Good thing it worked out that way, though, because planned
or unplanned, the range of comparisons and contrasts we can make between
each text's representations of country and city is a great way to begin
this "migration" unit of the "city" section of the course. Wilson's
play also brings up the issue of lynching, which we'll be treating from
many different angles of vision in Thursday's class; our goal there will
be to compare and contrast the emphases of each writer's treatment of lynching,
and relate them to different phases of the anti-lynching movement.
In thinking about the readings for this week, you can apply some of
the same questions that we asked of the slave narratives--about audience
and the various writers' literary, rhetorical, and political strategies,
about the kinds of arguments and assumptions they were writing against,
about these works' relations to earlier and contemporary works by African
Americans and others--to the anti-lynching essays and poems. Such
comparisons can also help you out as you're thinking about your critical
response essay and final essay. For instance, contrasting Ida B.
Wells's argumentative and rhetorical strategies in her 1895 essay with
Richard Wright's in his 1937 essay would most likely result in a fascinating
critical response paper.
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
For further representations of Chicago in black literature, see Richard
Wright's Black Boy and Native Son and Lorraine Hansberry's
A
Raisin in the Sun; unfortunately, we will have the opportunity to read
only Hansberry's play this semester. As I've noted several times
before, the place to start with the migration narrative is Farah Griffin's
"Who Set You Flowin'?".
-
The poems and essays on lynching included in the Norton are just the tip
of the iceberg; if you are interested in pursuing this topic further, you
might check out Jean Toomer's experimental work Cane [included in
full in the Norton], particularly the "Blood Burning Moon" and the
"Kabnis" section, Richard Wright's poem, "Between the World and Me" (which
is in part a response to the opening chapter of W.E.B. Du Bois's The
Souls of Black Folk), and his story "Long Black Song" [also included
in the Norton]. For a work set in the same turn-of-the century
time period as when many of the poems we'll be reading on Thursday were
written, see Charles Chesnutt's amazing novel, The Marrow of Tradition,
which puts lynching in the context of an anti-Reconstruction and anti-black
backlash taking place in the last quarter of the nineteenth century.
For secondary sources, see Angela Davis's Women, Race, and Class,
Sandra Gunning's Race, Rape, and Lynching, Trudier Harris's Exorcising
Blackness, and Stephen Michael Best's essay, "'Stand by Your Man':
Richard Wright, Lynch Pedagogy, and Rethinking Black Male Agency," in the
collection Representing Black Men, eds. Marcellus Blount and George
Cunningham [none of which are yet on reserve, but which can be found in
the library or borrowed from me].
-
Ma Rainey's Black Bottom is a fitting introduction to the "city"
section for many reasons, but perhaps most because it is centrally about
music, its contexts, its value, and its values. For a brief history
of the blues and examples of blues lyrics, see pages 22-36 of the Norton;
for a similar treatment of jazz, see pages 55-59. For poetry inspired
by the blues, see Paul Laurence Dunbar, "When Malindy Sings" [NA
894-896]; Sterling Brown, "Memphis Blues," "Ma Rainey," "Tin Roof Blues,"
and "Cabaret" [NA 1216-1218, 1220-1224]; Langston Hughes, "The Weary
Blues," "Homesick Blues," "Poí Boy Blues," and "Juke Box Love Song" [NA
1257, 1259-1260, 1266]; Robert Hayden, "Homage to the Empress of the Blues"
and "Mourning Poem for the Queen of Sunday" [NA 1500-1501, 1510-1511];
Sonia Sanchez, "for our lady" and excerpts from A Blues Book for Blue
Black Magical Women [NA 1904-1906]; Ishmael Reed, "Oakland Blues"
[NA 2296]; Al Young, "A Dance for Ma Rainey" [NA 2314-2315];
and Yusef Komunyakaa's poems [NA 2495-2498]. For poetry inspired
by jazz, see, among others, the John Coltrane poems by A.B. Spellman, Jayne
Cortez, and Michael Harper [NA 1955-1959, 2277-2280]; Langston Hughes,
"Jazzonia" [NA 1255-1256]; Robert Hayden, "Soledad" [NA 1511];
Bob Kaufman, "War Memoir" [NA 1724-1725]; and Clarence Major, "Round
Midnight" [NA 2224-2245]. Any number of paper ideas coming
out of contrasts between one or more of these works would work well for
a critical response essay. Outside the Norton, such novels
as Gayl Jones's Corregidora or Native American writer Sherman Alexie's
Reservation
Blues are major responses to the blues, just as Ishmael Reed's Mumbo
Jumbo and Toni Morrison's Jazz are major responses to jazz and
to the Harlem Renaissance, which we'll be turning to in the next two weeks.
Week 6: Renaissance I
This week we'll return to the "theory/practice" structure of Week 2
while examining the Harlem Renaissance. In Tuesday's class, we'll
contrast the ways different characters in Spike Lee's movie would flesh
out the oft-repeated phrases "do the right thing" and "fight the power",
and build on that discussion to a consideration of the ways the different
essayists from the 1920s would flesh out those phrases. These essayists,
after all, set the terms of critical debate during the Harlem Renaissance
and influenced scholars' accounts and analyses of the period after it ended.
Hence, we'll be focusing on points of agreement (common themes, arguments,
and rhetorical strategies) and disagreement (differing emphases, arguments,
and political motivations) in the essays by Du Bois, Locke, Schuyler, and
Hughes. Then in Thursday's class we'll examine some of the autobiographical
and quasi-journalistic accounts of the Harlem Renaissance by some of the
writers who helped define it, so as to see what kinds of themes and issues
emerge from these portraits of Harlem life and how they compare to the
more theoretical style of the writers from Tuesday's class. It may
be worthwhile to read ahead to the literary portraits of Harlem by Rudolph
Fisher and Langston Hughes due to be read by next Tuesday's class, because
they also relate to this week's readings. We're going to try to fit
our discussion of Menace II Society into this class period, as well,
to leave time for our guest lecturer next week to bring our attention squarely
to Samuel Delany's contemporary rewriting of the Harlem Renaissance through
his family history.
My goal in introducing you to the Harlem Renaissance through these various
responses to and representations of urban life is less to have you read
a good range of literature produced during this period than it is to give
you a sense of the major issues and problems in which those who have written
on (and wrote during) the period have been most centrally interested.
You can always go back to the Norton itself to read a wider selection
of the literature itself, or take another course devoted exclusively to
twentieth century literature (or even more focused in its scope); my goal
here is to give you a sense of the debates and discussions that frame the
Harlem Renaissance, so that when you read more literature written during
this period, you have a framework in which to understand it.
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
There is no substitute, of course, for reading as much of the literature
of the Harlem Renaissance as possible; the Norton's selections are
but the tip of the iceberg here. A fine sampling to the range of
literature and art produced during this period can be found in Alain Locke's
edited collection, The New Negro (1925). But major works
like Jean Toomer's Cane and Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were
Watching God (which many place near the beginning and end of the period,
respectively) are not to be missed. Arnold Rampersad has provided
several major works on this period: besides editing The Collected
Poems of Langston Hughes, he has written a two-volume autobiography
of Hughes and an intellectual biography of W.E.B. Du Bois, both of which
examine the culture and politics of the first third of the twentieth century.
-
For a wider selection of major essays from the period than we could devote
class time to, see the section on the Harlem Renaissance in Within the
Circle(both works on reserve). The Heath Anthology of American
Literature also has some interesting essay selections from this period.
Week 7: Renaissance II
Don't forget that reading responses for this week are due by 4 pm on
Monday! That's because we won't have class on Thursday, so there's
no point in asking questions for a class discussion that's not going to
happen. The other reason reading responses are due early this week
is so that our guest lecturer, Jeffrey Tucker of the University of Rochester--who
will give a lecture on Samuel Delany's "Atlantis: Model 1924" in
Tuesday's class, answer your questions, and help me lead a discussion on
the act of looking back on the Harlem Renaissance--can get a sense of the
kinds of issues and passages that interest you most.
Another important thing that will happen this week is that the assignment
sheet for the first critical response essay will be posted to the main
course page. Finally, I will also e-mail each of you mid-term assessments
of your work in the course to date. These should give you a good
sense of where you stand in the course and what you need to work on to
improve your standing. So be checking the course web site and your
email regularly before you leave for break (if you leave for break).
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
Samuel Delany is an accomplished science fiction writer and professor at
SUNY Buffalo. The English department is attempting to invite him
to speak here at Fredonia next semester. Through Professor Tucker,
I can get answers to any questions you may have about Delany or suggestions
about what other works of his you might read on your own.
-
For a re-vision of the Harlem Renaissance by a cultural historian and literary
critic who seems to have been influenced by Delany's conception of early
20th-century American and African American culture, see George Hutchinson's
The
Harlem Renaissance in Black and White. Much work remains to be
done in terms of widening our conceptions of modern American literature;
for my own attempt to realize this goal in a course, click here.
-
For major novels that look back at the 1920s, see in particular Ishmael
Reed's Mumbo Jumbo and Toni Morrison's Jazz.
Week 8: Post-Renaissance
Your critical response essay is due next week, but the idea is for you
to take advantage of last week's October Break to free up some thinking
and writing time for yourself. You can think of this paper as a dry run
for your final essay, or as an opportunity to pursue ideas that originated
in one of your film analyses in a more focused and developed manner.
Please see the above for various suggested topics for the critical response
essay, and click <a href="index.htm#cr">here</a> for the assignment
sheet.
This week we are concerned with the changing images of the city in the
1930s through 1950s, in the wake of the Harlem Renaissance. We consider
how black women writers engage the city in their fiction, and, as with
our analysis of the slave narratives, consider what difference gender and
sexuality makes to a writer's "take" on the city. Our guest lecturer,
Mark Anthony Neal of SUNY Albany, will use the traditions of and transitions
in black popular music as a means of tracking different generations' responses
to the conditions in and images of city during and beyond this period.
As with all the units, we are just skimming the surface of the rich
range of literature and music produced during this period. Feel free
to read more widely in the Norton for a sense of this range and
richness (I recommend Gwendolyn Brooks's Maud Martha in particular,
because of its influence on subsequent novels by black women writers),
but also be aware that the Norton selections themselves are meant
to be an introduction, so that you will have to find such major novels
as Richard Wright's Native Son and Black Boy, Ann Petry's
The
Street, Paule Marshall's Brown Girl, Brownstones, William Attaway's
Blood on the Forge, and Chester Himes's If He Hollers Let Him
Go on your own. In terms of non-fiction prose, W.E.B. Du Bois's
1940 autobiography Dusk of Dawn, Ralph Ellison's book of essays
Shadow and Act, and Malcolm X's Autobiography are essential
to understanding the culture and politics of the mid-twentieth century.
Our movie and lecture this week will provide o. Some of us will
view Slam and others of us will travel to Rochester to hear Angela
Davis speak on the death penalty, and the injustice of the impending execution
of black journalist and activist Mumia Abu-Jamal (scheduled for December
2), and what she calls "the prison-industrial complex."
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
I highly recommend looking at Mark Anthony Neal's What the Music Said
if you're interested in a cultural studies approach to mid-to-late-20th
century black popular music and public culture; along with Tricia Rose's
Black
Noise and Angela Davis's Blues Legacies and Black Feminism,
it is one of the essential guides to the politics of black music.
If you are interested in examining black popular culture in further depth
and detail, I highly recommend these books (along with the edited collections
The
Black Public Sphere and Black Popular Culture) as the place
to start your explorations (all are available on reserve at Reed Library).
Professor Neal will be teaching a course on this subject, available through
distance learning for Fredonia students, next semester; please see me or
Najia Aarim (history professor and director of the minor in African American
Studies) before course sign-up week (11/1-11/5).
-
For an influential historian's take on the period between the Harlem Renaissance
and the Civil Rights Movement, I highly recommend Robin D.G. Kelley's Race
Rebels: Culture, Politics, and the Black Working Class.
-
For more on Mumia Abu-Jamal, go to the www.mumia.org
or the National Peoples Campaign
websites, or borrow the collection of essays on his case from me.
Whether you see him as a political prisoner on death row for his views
rather than his actions, as a citizen deprived of his right to a fair trial
and deserving of a right to appeal an unfair trial, or are simply curious
about who he is, what he's accused of, and what you can do about all this,
these sites will be of great use to you, even if you don't agree with all
the positions expressed on them.
-
For more on Angela Davis, besides her two books (on reserve), see her essay
on the prison abolition movement in The House That Race Built.
Week 9: Color Lines
We shift to the "nation" unit this
week, which is centrally concerned with two different versions of nationalism
that have appealed to many black writers and intellectuals--on the one
hand, U.S. nationalism (Americanism, patriotism, the American dream, and
so on), and on the other, black nationalism (which ranges the ideological
spectrum: the Black Panthers are quite different from Asante's Afrocentrism
which in turn is quite different from the Nation of Islam). We will
endeavor to track different writers' relations to these two intellectual
and political traditions, with the understanding that neither is reducible
to one side of the simple binary of "assimilationism" vs. "separatism."
To reduce commitment to U.S. nationalism to a desire for "assimilation"
is a tragic and false assumption: as we saw in the "city" unit, a
writer like Alain Locke could praise the growing and changing "race consciousness"
in Harlem precisely for (in his view) its Americanism, and as we will see
in Du Bois's essays from The Souls of Black Folk, his commitment
to U.S. nationalism (evident in his call for full citizenship and other
rights) in 1903 stemmed from his sense that African Americans had in part
created
American culture and society. It is also important to recognize that
the writers who share a commitment to U.S. nationalism disagree on all
sorts of matters, and that their different political and rhetorical strategies
were meant to intervene on a particular historical conjunction that is
quite different from our own (hence we need to analyze what David Walker
was attempting to do in 1829, what Langston Hughes was attempting to express
in 1925, and what Melvin Tolson was attempting to trace in 1944, and to
attend to the similarities and differences between Douglass's oration,
Du Bois's and Baldwin's essays, and King's letter). At most, what
these writers share is a refusal to equate "white" and "America," an attempt
to put race matters in a national frame and on a national stage (i.e.,
slavery as not just a Southern problem in the mid-nineteenth century but
a national one; race as not just an urban issue since the '30s but a national
one), and a desire to create new national narratives for America.
Our goal is to engage the complexities of these writers' re-thinking and
re-visioning of U.S. nationalism. Later in the semester, we will
have to go through a similar process of learning to engage the complexities
of black nationalist discourses, to learn how to avoid a reductionist approach
that would equate black nationalism and "separatism."
But for this week, we'll sample a range of U.S. nationalist writings,
in a kind of prelude to reading Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man as
a complicated meditation on race and democracy in the United States.
Like Frederick Douglass's Narrative, W.E.B. Du Bois's The Souls
of Black Folk, Jean Toomer's Cane, Richard Wright's Native
Son, and Toni Morrison's Beloved, Ellison's novel is considered
by most scholars to be at the core of both the African American and American
literary traditions. In much the same way that Tolson's "Dark Symphony"
draws on modernist aesthetics to construct a poetic overview of African
American literature and history (one in which the poem's form and structure
contribute as much to its meaning as the overt statements in it), Invisible
Man confronts the central issues of post-WW II American democracy and
culture.
The documentary films we're seeing this week , Sa-I-Gu and The
Bombing of Osage Avenue, both attempt to register the voices and perspectives
of those who were unheard and unseen (or misrepresented) in the national
media during two of the many infamous "police actions" in the past two
decades--Korean and Korean-American shopkeepers in Los Angeles in 1992
and the community members whose block was destroyed by Philadelphia police
in 1985--in all their complexity and ambivalence. While the LA "riots"
became a national media event, the attack on MOVE has received comparatively
little national attention (say, compared to Waco), but both show how what
may seem to be exclusively city-related events (riots, police actions)
must be understood in a national context.
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
I highly recommend reading David Walker's Appeal in its entirety,
and seeing it as a response to sections of Thomas Jefferson's late 18th-century
work Notes on the State of Virginia; the way in which Walker
contrasted The Declaration of Independence with Jefferson's later
writings was highly influential in the decades leading up to the Civil
War.
-
Another must-read is Frederick Douglass's The Heroic Slave, a novella
he wrote after his break with Garrison and roughly contemporaneous with
his oration, "What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July," which is also worth
reading in its entirety and in relation to his later autobiography, My
Bondage and My Freedom.
-
For the post-Reconstruction era, it's worth contrasting Booker T. Washington's
Up
from Slavery with W.E.B Du Bois's The Souls of Black Folk
as
competing visions of U.S. nationalism in a post-slavery era.
-
The key secondary source for all these issues is The House That Race
Built, ed. Wahneema Lubiano. Also essential are Michael Omi and
Howard Winant's Racial Formation in the United States and the collection
Critical
Race Theory, edited by Kimberle Crenshaw, et al.
-
For more on the LA "riots"/"uprising"/"multiracial bread riot"/etc. in
the wake of the acquittal of four white police officers who nearly beat
Rodney King to death, see the collection Reading Rodney King/Reading
Urban Uprising. For two essays that focus on representations
of Asian Americans in LA around this time, ask me for David Palumbo-Liu's
essay from Public Culture and Neil Gotanda's "Tales of Two Trials:
Joyce Karlin in People v. Soon Ja Du; Lance Ito in People v.
O.J. Simpson," The House That Race Built: Black Americans, U.S.
Terrain, ed. Wahneema Lubiano (NY: Pantheon, 1997) 66-86. For
other works to seek out, click here.
Mike Davis's City of Quartz analyzes LA's history, and his essays
since the publication of this book are similarly cogent; for a sampling
of such essays, click here
(after clicking, scroll down until you reach his last name; the page is
organized alphabetically).
-
For more on the bombing of MOVE in Philadelphia, see Michael Boyette's
1989 study, Let It Burn! The Philadelphia Tragedy. For more
on Philadelphia, see W.E.B. Du Bois's sociological study, The Philadelphia
Negro, Noel Ignatiev's historical study How the Irish Became White
(particularly for its treatment of the 1838 anti-abolitionist riot mentioned
in the film), and pay particular attention to Paule Marshall's treatment
of that city in The Chosen Place, The Timeless People.
Weeks 10 and 11: Black...America
The preliminary proposal for your final paper is due in two weeks (F,
11/5). See the main
page for more details and advice, but the general idea is that by the
end of October you should have several possible ideas you'd like to pursue
further. What this proposal is about is getting you to put those ideas
on paper and discuss the pros and cons of each. Over the next few weeks,
you should be doing whatever decision-making, research, re-reading, note-taking,
and pre-writing exercises you find most helpful for getting your analytical
juices flowing--and you'll meet with me early in November to help direct
that flow--so the more detailed and thoughtful you are in this preliminary
proposal, the better. That way I can have more information to go on while
helping you choose the idea you find most interesting for your final paper.
There's no time like the present for thinking about ideas for the final
paper.
Reading Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man while you're thinking about
this proposal should be quite productive for you, as Ellison's novel is,
in its own way, an analysis of the same country-city-nation issues that
have structured this course. Use your reading of Invisible Man
as an opportunity to test how far you've come thus far in the course, as
well. The issues he raises and scenarios he treats should be quite
familiar to you; the techniques of close reading I've been emphasizing
should help you understand the wider significance of his often surrealistic
plot.
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
Cultural Contexts for Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man, edited by Eric
Sundquist, is on reserve at Reed Library. I can't recommend this
work highly enough, particularly if you are interested in the significance
of many of Ellison's allusions to African American popular culture and
vernacular traditions--because the way he signifies on them is difficult
to understand without first understanding what he is alluding to.
At the same time, Ellison repeatedly emphasized that his narrative was
as influenced by Melville, Twain, James, Hemingway, Joyce, and other non-black
writers as it was by earlier and contemporary black storytellers, writers
and musicians. Thus in the opening pages of his novel he refers to
Melville's "Benito Cereno" (one of novel's epigrams) and Moby-Dick
(the "blackness of blackness" sermon). So the more you've read of
American literature and modern/modernist literature more generally, the
better able you'll be to appreciate Ellison's riffs and improvisations.
However, the collection on reserve is as good a place as any to start.
-
For a sense of the 1930s and 1940s political terrain in Harlem that Ellison's
narrator enters about mid-way through the novel, see the essays on that
time period in Robin D.G. Kelley's Race Rebels: Culture, Politics,
and the Black Working Class, Mark Naison's Communists in Harlem
during the Depression, and Paul Buhle's Marxism in the United States:
Remapping the History of the American Left. For a critique of
Ellison's representation of the political scene in this era, see Barbara
Foley's Radical Representations.
Week 12: Black Arts
As with the Harlem Renaissance unit, we're going to be investigating
the relation between claims made in manifesto-style essays that announce
the black aesthetic movement's project and what happens in poetry and stories
written during and after the movement's high water mark. Of particular
interest will be our consideration of the gender politics of black nationalism,
and the ways in which women writers committed to the movement negotiated
a space for themselves within it, in the face of restoration of black patriarchy
many of its leaders seemed to be advocating.
Suggestions for further exploration:
-
Just as Alain Locke's The New Negro and other anthologies announced
and enacted the Harlem Renaissance project, so, too, do collections like
Black Fire: An Anthology of Afro-American Writing (eds. Larry
Neal and Amiri Baraka) or Addison Gayle's Black Expression, or critical
studies like Stephen Henderson's Understanding the New Black Poetry
and Addison Gayle's The Black Aesthetic, similarly announce and
enact the black aesthetic movement's project.
-
For an examination of how several black women writers of the time responded
to the aesthetics promoted in these works, see Madhu Dubey's Black Women
Novelists and the Nationalist Aesthetic. For the best work on
the relation between black nationalist politics and aesthetics, see the
essays by Wahneema Lubiano in Mapping Multiculturalism, The House
That Race Built, and Borders, Boundaries, and Frames.
See also David Lionel Smith's essays on the black aesthetic movement in
the collections The House That Race Built and The Black Columbiad.
Week 13: Colonialism
OK, this week before you leave for break you have to turn in your polished
proposal for the final paper. Over the previous few weeks you should have
been focusing your ideas on one topic. Your job in this proposal is now
to transmit your vision for your paper to your peers, to convince them
that your topic is interesting and important. The earlier you think about
what
you want to investigate and why--that is, both the parameters of
your project and your goals/purposes/reasons for pursuing it--the better
off you'll be for the writing of the actual essay itself. Remember
that the key question a proposal has to answer is "so what?"--why does
what you want to analyze matter? The reading load for this week is
very light, both to give you a chance to focus on this proposal, which
will be graded on its clarity and persuasiveness, and to catch up on previous
readings/look ahead to the last novel in the course, Paule Marshall's The
Chosen Place, The Timeless People. We're going to be reading
several examples of twentieth-century African-American writing that looks
beyond the borders of the United States this week, so be prepared to discuss
patterns, juxtapositions, and intersections among the works, as well as
offer intepretations of specific passages in these works in class discussion.
Week 14: NO CLASSES (THANKSGIVING BREAK)
How, you may ask, could I possibly have anything to tell you about a
week in which we have no class meetings? Well, here's the answer: even
though there are only two weeks left in the semester, you are going to
need to use this break wisely. If you can finish Paule Marshall's The
Chosen Place, The Timeless People over this break, you will only need
to refresh your memory before class about the section of the novel we'll
be discussing that day. Then you'll be able to focus your efforts on generating
a rough draft of the final essay well in advance of the due date--so you
can work on revising it in the last week of classes, rather than composing
it. In fact, you might even consider getting some ideas down on paper over
the break--hey, if you've gotten a topic you really care about, this should
actually be the most exciting time of the semester. If you plan ahead,
the last two weeks of class will be a breeze; if not, they will be anything
but.
Week 15: Trauma
We'll be discussing roughly the first half of Paule Marshall's novel
in class this week. I'll be available to meet with you to discuss
your final essay, as well.
Week 16: Mourning
We'll be discussing roughly the second half of Marshall's novel in class
this week. I'll be available to meet with you to discuss your
final essay, as well.
M
A I N * S
C H E D U L E * N
E W S * L
I N K S * R
E S E R V E S
EN 240: Intro to African American Lit and Culture, Fall
1999
Created: 8/23/99, 11:10 pm
Last modified: 11/13/99 5:27 pm