Assignment Sheet: Response Papers
As you know, you are required to write at least one two-to-four-page response essay on one or two works from the "Literature of Reconstruction" unit, and at least one two-to-four-page response essay on one or two works from the "Literature of Migration" unit. These response essays are designed to be brief critical explorations of topics and questions that evolve out of the assigned readings and class discussion. You may write on any work(s) assigned for class discussion and may approach your topic(s) from any angle, so long as your essays have a coherent argument, meet length requirements, and use MLA format for citations and bibliography. Since your response paper grade (worth 20% of your final grade in the course) will be the average of all your short essay grades, you can potentially improve your grade in this area by writing additional essays beyond the two that are required. This page gives the assignment sheet for the first and second response essays; any additional essays you write may be on any texts or issues from the course, but feel free to draw on suggested topics from the Literature of Resistance unit. Click here for further advice on drafting and editing thesis-driven papers.
Response Paper #1
Due: no later than the beginning of class Monday, September 30.
Format: 2-4 pages, double spaced, with reasonable fonts, font sizes, and margins; title that indicates main argument of paper; heading that includes your name, the course name or number, and the date; bibliography and citations in MLA style (see the links page for explanations of this style of citation); proper quotation format for quotations within a paragraph: "..." (12); blockquote format for quotes five lines or longer.
Criteria for Evaluation: No matter which topic you invent or option you choose for the response essay, I will be grading your paper in terms of how well you make your case for your argument, how well you base your argument on textual analysis and interpretation, and how well-organized and well-written your paper is. Hence I will be evaluating the coherence, validity, and persuasiveness of your paper's argument, the effectiveness of your paper's structure, and the quality of your paper's prose (grammar, syntax, and punctuation).
Suggested Topics: There are two main themes running throughout the "Literature of Reconstruction" unit, which groups American literature from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries first by topic ("Remembering the Civil War," "The Racial Politics of Reconstruction") and then by region ("Creole New Orleans," "The New West," "New England Personae," "Midwestern Trifles").
The first theme--"Legacies of Slavery, Civil War, and Reconstruction: The Significance of the American Past at the Turn into the Twentieth Century"--roughly corresponds to the grouping of texts by topic during the first four weeks of the unit and begins from the notion that writers in the late nineteenth century U.S. were often looking back to the recent past to answer new (and newly pressing) questions in the wake of the Civil War, the abolition of slavery, and the collapse of Reconstruction: who counts as American and stands for America? what are the rights of Americans (particularly the former slaves who became citizens for the first time only after the Civil War)? how, to what ends, on whose terms, and at whose cost should regional reconciliation and a new sense of national identity be engineered? how ought America and Americans act toward "others," both on the continent (particularly ex-slaves, Indians, and immigrants) and off (particularly in Hawaii, Cuba, and the Philippines)?
The second theme--"Region and Race, Dialect and Difference: American Realism in Historical Context"--roughly corresponds to the grouping of texts by region in the final two weeks of the unit and begins from the notion that the emphasis on "realistic" representations of regional, gender, class, racial, and vernacular particularities and differences in late nineteenth U.S. literature shows that American realism looks out on a nation in the throes of major transformations. What is at stake in the emphasis on American voices, vernaculars, and accents in American realism? Why are regional and national transformation so often figured through domestic, gendered, and sexual imagery, themes, and plots in American realist literature? What conclusions can we draw about the relationship between those seeking to preserve in print a sense of regional specificity and the newly national audiences who consume those preserves? How and to what ends do early twentieth-century modernists like Frost, Glaspell, and Anderson pay homage to and play with the conventions of American realism?
Mark Twain's Adventures of Huckleberry Finn bridges these two themes: on the one hand, it looks back to the antebellum period in order to comment on the racial politics of the post-Reconstruction U.S.; on the other, it focuses on American dialects and differences in order to comment on shifting regional and national identities. Hence, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn appears quite often in the following list of suggested topics for each of these themes. This list provides an overview of the issues and inquiries that shaped my selection of texts and topics when designing the syllabus for this course as well as a record of our emphases during our class discussions. It is meant to be suggestive rather than exhaustive. You may write on any topic that relates to the assigned readings or our class discussions in the "Literature of Reconstruction" unit--in fact, you are encouraged to pursue a line of inquiry and argument that is both interesting and important to you. Whatever topic you choose or invent, keep in mind that your job is to choose one or two works from the "Literature of Reconstruction" unit and develop an argument that you are trying to prove by using textual evidence to persuade your readers of your interpretations' validity.
Response Paper #2
Due: no later than the beginning of class Monday, November 11.
Format: 2-4 pages, double spaced, with reasonable fonts, font sizes, and margins; title that indicates main argument of paper; heading that includes your name, the course name or number, and the date; bibliography and citations in MLA style (see the links page for explanations of this style of citation); proper quotation format for quotations within a paragraph: "..." (12); blockquote format for quotes five lines or longer.
Criteria for Evaluation: No matter which topic you invent or option you choose for the response essay, I will be grading your paper in terms of how well you make your case for your argument, how well you base your argument on textual analysis and interpretation, and how well-organized and well-written your paper is. Hence I will be evaluating the coherence, validity, and persuasiveness of your paper's argument, the effectiveness of your paper's structure, and the quality of your paper's prose (grammar, syntax, and punctuation).
Suggested Topics: The "Literature of Migration" unit focuses on literary representations of and responses to a variety of migrations to and within the U.S. roughly between the 1880s and the 1940s. It posits that American literature was participating in a wider cultural debate over issues of migration--the causes of migrations and motivations of migrants; the processes of migration and experiences of migrants; and the effects on, consequences of, and legacies of migration for migrants, natives, and national identity--in the early twentieth century. The unit, then, seeks to put into relation to each other such varied migrations as the westward expansion of settlers from the east and south to the western U.S. after the Civil War; the forced migrations ("removals") of American Indians in the midwest and west during the same period; the "great migration" of African Americans from the rural south to urban centers in the south, midwest, and north in the early decades of the twentieth century; the movements of various immigrant groups from Asia, eastern Europe, and southern Europe during this entire period; the travels of Americans abroad, whether as soldiers during WWI, as tourists in Europe in the 1880s, or as expatriates in the 1920s and 1930s; the migrations caused by the environmental and economic crises of the 1930s (the Great Depression); and the effects of technologies like railroads on social mobility and movement in American society. It does so by encouraging students to explore relations between developments in literary history--the emergence of new styles, new genres, and new literary movements in the multiple modernisms of the early twentieth century; the mutation and development of more established movements like realism and naturalism; and the shift from a regional to a national or even international scope and subject matter for American literature--and the political, economic, and social issues facing the United States in a period characterized by increasingly rapid movements of peoples, goods, and ideas, by sharpening class and international conflicts, and by the great "shocks" of the early twentieth century (World War I, the Communist Revolution in Russia, the 1929 stock market crash and worldwide crisis of capitalism). How did the literature of this period register and respond to these forces transforming American society and identity? How and to what ends did writers attempt to represent and intervene in the world around them?
William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying, like Mark Twain's Adventures of Huckleberry Finn before it, is a bridge text here. It both looks backward to the regionalist and realistic writings of the nineteenth century and participates fully in the modernist challenge to inherited conventions of representation, narration, plot, and character. The journey of the Bundren family functions as a metaphorical migration that can be related to many of the more literal migrations of this unit.
What follows is an overview of the issues and inquiries that shaped my selection of texts and topics when designing the syllabus for this course as well as a record of our emphases during our class discussions. It is meant to be suggestive rather than exhaustive. You may write on any topic that relates to the assigned readings or our class discussions in the "Literature of Migration" unit--in fact, you are encouraged to pursue a line of inquiry and argument that is both interesting and important to you. Whatever topic you choose or invent, keep in mind that your job is to choose one or two works from the "Literature of Migration" unit and develop a debate-able argument that you are trying to support by using textual evidence to persuade your readers of your interpretation's plausibility and validity.
Additional Response Papers
Due: any time before the last day of classes
Format: 2-4 pages, double spaced, with reasonable fonts, font sizes, and margins; title that indicates main argument of paper; heading that includes your name, the course name or number, and the date; bibliography and citations in MLA style (see the links page for explanations of this style of citation); proper quotation format for quotations within a paragraph: "..." (12); blockquote format for quotes five lines or longer.
Criteria for Evaluation: No matter which topic you invent or option you choose for the response essay, I will be grading your paper in terms of how well you make your case for your argument, how well you base your argument on textual analysis and interpretation, and how well-organized and well-written your paper is. Hence I will be evaluating the coherence, validity, and persuasiveness of your paper's argument, the effectiveness of your paper's structure, and the quality of your paper's prose (grammar, syntax, and punctuation).
Suggested Topics: The "Literature of Resistance" unit begins from the premise that one prominent problematic in American literature between 1910 and 1990 is an exploration of what is at stake in various kinds of resistance to certain American traditions, conventions, and institutions. By putting writings from "literary" movements like modernism and postmodernism alongside writings from "social" movements like the Civil Rights movement and feminism, the "Literature of Resistance" unit challenges us to reconsider the assumptions that would separate the literary from the social, the aesthetic from the historical, and poetics from politics. By linking modernists with writers of the Harlem Renaissance, Beats with writers of the Civil Rights movement, postmodernists with writings on Vietnam and feminism, the unit invites us to explore the relations between various forms of resistance, to evaluate the ways in which writers resist social and aesthetic conventions, traditions, and institutions, and to consider what light these resistances shed on our present.
Toni Morrison's The Bluest Eye, like William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying and Mark Twain's Adventures of Huckleberry Finn before it, is a bridge text here. Like Twain and Faulkner, Morrison looks closely into the experiences and listens to the voices of those marginalized in and by American society. Just as Twain's novel combines romanticism and realism, and Faulkner's realism and modernism, Morrison's novel draws on and transforms several American literary traditions, including realism, modernism, and postmodernism. The Bluest Eye, moreover, illustrates clearly the connections and relations between history and aesthetics, between politics and poetics, that the "Literature of Resistance" unit is engaged in exploring. Unlike many of the writers in the unit, however, Morrison has us consider what happens to a character who offers little or no resistance to the forces and institutions that are both shaping and destroying her. Her novel poses the challenge of how best to resist a racialized aesthetics, an aestheticized racism.
What follows is an overview of the issues and inquiries that shaped my selection of texts and topics when designing the syllabus for this course as well as a record of our emphases during our class discussions. It is meant to be suggestive rather than exhaustive. You may write on any topic that relates to the assigned readings or our class discussions in the "Literature of Resistance" or any other unit--in fact, you are encouraged to pursue a line of inquiry and argument that is both interesting and important to you. Whatever topic you choose or invent, keep in mind that your job is to choose one or two works from the "Literature of Resistance" or any other unit and develop a debate-able argument that you are trying to support by using textual evidence to persuade your readers of your interpretation's plausibility and validity.
ENGL 206: Survey of American Literature, Fall 2002
Rationale: The response essays are your chance to practice developing a critical argument that stems from your response to the assigned texts and our class discussions of them. Treat them as an opportunity to move beyond what we do in class--developing hypotheses, opinions, and possible answers to key questions--by trying to support a hypothesis, convince someone else to accept your opinion, or persuade your audience that your answer is not only possible but is also highly plausible. The response papers are your place to pursue some of the key issues of the course in more depth, at greater length, and with more textual support than we are typically able to do in a 50-minute class period.
Rationale: The response essays are your chance to practice developing a critical argument that stems from your response to the assigned texts and our class discussions of them. Treat them as an opportunity to move beyond what we do in class--developing hypotheses, opinions, and possible answers to key questions--by trying to support a hypothesis, convince someone else to accept your opinion, or persuade your audience that your answer is not only possible but is also highly plausible. The response papers are your place to pursue some of the key issues of the course in more depth, at greater length, and with more textual support than we are typically able to do in a 50-minute class period.
Rationale: The response essays are your chance to practice developing a critical argument that stems from your response to the assigned texts and our class discussions of them. Treat them as an opportunity to move beyond what we do in class--developing hypotheses, opinions, and possible answers to key questions--by trying to support a hypothesis, convince someone else to accept your opinion, or persuade your audience that your answer is not only possible but is also highly plausible. The response papers are your place to pursue some of the key issues of the course in more depth, at greater length, and with more textual support than we are typically able to do in a 50-minute class period.
Created: 9/9/02 7:04 pm
Last modified: 12/13/02 4:50 pm