GENERAL CAUTION
by
Robert Schweik
© 2000-2003
Texts are often made available by links to or downloads from "Project Gutenberg," "Bibliomania," "Poets' Corner," "The Oxford Text Archive," and many other electronic sources. Project Gutenberg e-texts are among those most frequently linked to Hardy-related web sites. The names and e-mail addresses of the volunteer transcribers, preparers, and proofreaders of Project Gutenberg e-texts may be supplied, though in varying degrees of fullness; not always provided are bibliographic identifications of the printed texts upon which the transcriptions are based, and these are often editions not suitable for scholarly citation. Even with an e-text collection like "The Oxford Text Archive", print sources are not always indentified, and texts vary greatly in accuracy and in the formats in which they have been encoded. In short, because information about sources and procedures of preparation of e-texts of Hardy's writings are so often incomplete, if not completely absent, it is reasonable to be cautious about their reliability. For a helpful discussion of criteria for evaluation of e-texts, see "Frequently Asked Questions About E-Texts" and "Electronic Texts: Guidelines for Evaluation" by the the Princeton/Rutgers Center for Electronic Texts in Humanities (
http://www.ceth.rutgers.edu/). An even more sophisticated discussion of standards in creating and documenting electronic texts and good practice in such matters as scanning, markup, documentation and provision of metadata may be found at the Oxford Text Archive site http://ota.ahds.ac.uk/documents/creating/. At present, scholars using existing Hardy e-texts available on the WWW or other sources on the Internet will almost always find it necessary to compare any citations they make from such texts against an authoritative print edition.Finally, with respect to the reproduction on the Internet of photographs, maps, and other images related to Hardy's life and work, not only is it important to ascertain their copyright status but, also, to be wary of how they are identified. It is not uncommon to find images on the Web whose captions are simply erroneous: a picture of the Sheldonian Theatre has been identified as the Bodleian Library; a Tolpuddle scene has been linked with Hardy's Talbothays; and even the well-known map of the whole of Hardy's Wessex has been mistakenly labeled "Outer Wessex." But although images are sometimes provided with erroneous captions, a far more common problem is that although there may be a possible connection between a picture and an element in Hardy's writings, the image will be labeled in such a simplistic way--e.g., "Lucetta's House," "Tess's Cottage," or "Henchard's Seed Shop"--as to be potentially misleading. Pictures should be identified by the name of their real subject--e.g., "Barclays Bank, South Street, Dorchester"--accompanied by the date of the picture, the source of the picture, and copyright details. Further indications of the relationship of the subject of a picture to a fictional element in Hardy's writings will be most helpfully accurate if made with appropriate qualifications and supported by quotations and other relevant documentation.